Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP for Utilities
Viewing all 2484 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Which event triggered on posting of returns

February 7, 2015, 12:18 pm
$
0
0

Hi gurus,

 

We are trying to post a return document and during posting and then prit it using FPCOPARA. Unfortunately during printing, an error comes like 0000 items selected. we are assuming the DFKKCOH table is not getting filled which results in an empty dfkk container.

 

We tried events to check which event is getting triggered while posting, but despite putting breakpoints we are unable to zero in n the particular event.

 

i have 2 questions.

 

1. has anyone faced the situation in FPCOPARA where due to unfilled DFKK* tables we are unable to print? if so, how do we fix it?

2. how to zero in on a particular event which is being triggered when the postings are made?

 

any help will be highly appreciated. thanks!!

 

regards,

suman

↧
Search

Replication of ISU Installation Facts with CRM Product Attributes

November 25, 2014, 2:09 pm
$
0
0

Hello,

 

I am wondering what the standard way of replicating ECC installation fact to CRM Service Product attributes in CRM. I have already created CRM Service Products for each of the Rate Categories on the ECC side. I have looked all over for days on SCN and any and all other sources, and although I did not find anything I have narrowed down the way to do this to one of the following:

 

1) The BAdis ECRM_UPLOAD/ECRM_DOWNLOAD on the CRM system and the BAdi ECRM_CRM_UPLOAD/ECRM_CRM_DOWNLOAD on the IS-U system.

2) Using Master Data Templates (Example, for a product MDT template, create all of the Installation Facts that would be relevant to the corresponding Rate Category for that Product)

3) Configuration for the attributes in CRM and the installation facts in ECC so that it is automatic

 

Are any of these standard SAP ways or best practice to achieve this functionality?

 

Thank you,

 

Jon

↧
↧

Account determination id

February 4, 2015, 12:13 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

I have defined ADI 01 at contract account level,while I post a document FPE1 it picks B1 instead of 01.

I wanted to pick 01,but it not happening,please advise me on this issue ?

Please find screen shot.

 

 

Best Regards

Amit

↧

Posting statistical debit item in mass write off process FP04M

February 9, 2015, 6:25 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have a requirement for which the solution proposed involved posting a statistical debit item during write off process. So we enhanced event 5040 to post item there (called function module ISU_S_FICA_DOC_CREATE).

Now this solution is working fine for single write off process, but for mass process FP04M, we get an error - function modules called in incorrect sequence.

 

Is this a known problem? Is there any configuration that we may be missing ?

 

Any help would be appreciated!

 

Regards,

AM

↧

Not able to use oData Services for PUT method, Facing issue with BCONTACT_CREATE

February 10, 2015, 10:17 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am trying to use oData Services with PUT method, but it's not working. facing issue with BCONTACT_CREATE. error coming as below:

 

 

 

 

I checked in debugging, it's giving error in BCONTACT_CREATE FM.

 

Inputs are correctly passed,

 

There is a Badi ISU_UMC_BUSINESS_SETTINGS with method SET_BC_DEFAULT_PARAMETERS which returns basic settings how BP contact should be created. Maybe, those basic settings are not configured properly.

 

Could you please let me know that what all customization or configuration is required to make this working.

 

Early response will be highly appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Prince Pasricha

↧
↧

Suppressing F4 message in EA22

February 11, 2015, 6:29 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We are looking to enhance tcode EA22 in such a way that if no billing document is found as per search criteria entered in F4 help screen (F4 on billing document number) - we need to suppress message ' No documents found' coming from standard F4 function module and implement our custom functionality instead.

 

Is there any way to achieve this other than putting up code in an enhancement point inside the standard F4 help function module ?

 

Regards,

AM

↧

payment document

February 11, 2015, 6:16 am
$
0
0

Hi FICA Experts,


Can you please tell me how I can determine the payment document(bank )  for  a invoice , if  the invoice was cleared with transaction FPMA or FP06 ?
Exemple/ 
invoice F1(OPBEL) have in DFKKOP.AUGBL =71 and BETRW=10
invoice F2(OPBEL) have in DFKKOP.AUGBL =71 and BETRW=20
payment document P1(OPBEL) have in DFKKOP.AUGBL =71 and BETRW=-15
payment document P2(OPBEL) have in DFKKOP.AUGBL =71 and BETRW=-15


All this documents (F1,F2,P1,P2) are contained in the clearing document=71.
I want to see which payment document (P1,P2) cleared which invoice (F1,F2).

I need these to determine the bank from DFKKZP table for invoice F1 and F2.
thank you
Anamaria

↧

SD posting to FICA - Derive FICA document from SD billing type

February 11, 2015, 8:19 am
$
0
0

I want to post a standard F2 billing document from SD to FI-CA instead of FI-A/R. I do not want to create a new invoice in IS-U (via a billing request).  This is for non-consumption sales.

I have populated the first two steps under the Integration>Sales and Distribution node in Contract accounts Receivable and Payable.

I am now having difficulty populating the "Source Doc type" field in the IMG's  "Derive FI-CA document from SD billing type" step (txn FQC1210).

The system is ECC6, enhancement pack 6 with IS-Utilities.

Convergent invoicing is not switched on.

Derive FICA document from SD billing type.PNG

 

What is the correct value to insert in the Source Doc type field?

Does Convergent Invoicing have to be involved in order to get values for Source Doc type, or is it not necessary?

Is it necessary to activate any additional Business Functions?

 

Assistance will be appreciated.

↧
Search

Account Maintenance clearing issue

February 11, 2015, 6:30 am
$
0
0

Hi Expert,

 

 

Could you please help me on this issue urgently.I am stucked in my work.

 

My requirement is – If there are some open debit charges and invoices in an account .When payment posted on account it should first clear the invoice line items .

 

The intent of these changes is to make sure that main 0006 is cleared after mains 0100 and 0150. The only inconsistency I see here is the due date.

 

I have made SPRO configuration change for this.

Configuration change has been in following path.

 

SPRO Node: Financial Accounting  Contract Accounts Receivables and Payable  Basic Functions  Open Item Management  Clearing Control  Clearing Variants  Define Clearing Variants

 

The following changes need to be taken into effect:

  1.   Removal of main 0006 from grouping and clearing strings for the following variants and sequences:
    1.   Variant AM2 Acct Maintenance New

      1. Sequence: 50, 70, 95, & 97

    2.   Variant AM3 Acct Maintenance New-Collective

      1. Sequence: 50, 70, 95, & 97

    3.   Variant PA2 Payment Clearing new

      1. Sequence: 50 & 95

    4.   Variant Z47 All Invoicing Except Final (New)

      1. Sequence: 40, 50, 80,  & 90

 

It is working fine when payment posted on account the only problem is with Account Maintance T-Code FP06 (when Create proposal is checked .

 

 

 

It is also working as expected when due dates of invoice are in past but this is not working when due dates are in the future dated . as per requirement is it should

  •   Clear overdue periodic bills first
  •   Clear any other overdue charges next

  •   If there is any residual then also clear future dated receivables invoice

Scenario #1

Payment posted on account which is more than overdue receivables amount to verify how SAP will clear residual amount

 

System proposed to clear all overdue receivables, part of periodic bill, and EE charges

 

Scenario # 2 :- Checked the same account maintance when due dates of invoices are in the past.

 

Posted Check payment on the account to verify if check payment behavious differently

 

Here, Due dates are in past and this is working as expected .

 

pic.jpg

 

pic2.jpgpic3.jpg

 

 

 

Many Thanks,

Gyanendra

↧
↧

Error AH340 and EN470 while changing register group on a device

February 11, 2015, 10:31 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

I tried to change the register group on a device using Tcode Eg42. I am getting the error message:

1. Please specify a valid rate fact group for rate type CER

2. Rate data is no longer consistent

 

Please suggest what could be the reason for this and how do I change the register group.

↧

Difference between SAP External Payment Collectors and External Cash Desk Services

May 1, 2014, 9:59 pm
$
0
0

Hi Friends,

 

I am getting confused between the functionality of SAP External Payment Collectors and External Cash Desk Services .

 

Can anyone let me know the basic difference between SAP External Payment Collectors and External Cash Desk Services

 

Thanks

 

Puneet

↧

Configurations in FI-CA to execute the payment run.

February 16, 2015, 5:05 am
$
0
0

Hi colleagues,

 

We have the FI-CA component installed in our SAP system.

Could you please guide us on all the configurations and steps that will be required to execute the payment run for FI-CA component(FPY1).

We want to create a DMEE tree for FICA payments similar to that of AR/AP payments and generate a payment file for the same using the payment run program.

Would appreciate your inputs.

 

Regards,

Vijay.

↧

Billing line are not appearing from billing doc vieuw

February 16, 2015, 5:41 am
$
0
0


Hi Expert,

 

When display a billing doc , I click on th Doc.Overview tab in order to display billinbg doc lines.

But no billing lines are shown, the tab is empty.

I'have checked if filters are set but I could not find how to solve this.

 

Can anybody know how to solve this ?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Thierno

↧
↧

EL16, Meter Read Order is downloading incorrect, upper limit and lower limit at EL31 page 1 screen shows correct but while downloading in file this value does not match with EL31 page1 upper lower limit

February 7, 2015, 12:41 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

When i download meter read order through T-Code EL16, upper & lower limit are downloading incorrect in file. I am using custom application form to download this values.

 

e.g.

At T-Code EL31 page 1 tab shows upper & lower limit values are correct, but while downloading this values are different in output file.

 

El31, page1 tab                                 file downloaded through EL16 using custom application form

 

Upper limit  : 1200                             8200

Lower limit  : 400                              1500

 

This issues is happening with only few meter and when i download this MR order individually then this error is not replicating, i tried to download this meter with few other MR order (like used MRU which have 500 MR order to be downloaded together) then also this issue is not replicated.

 

When i tried to download this meter with 1 portion(like 1.5 lakhs MR order together) then only this issue is replicating.

 

I checked the custom Application form, in form i have used FM " ISU_determine_Tolerence_limit" to get the upper & lower Limit values.

The output of this FM is matching with the EL31, Page1 tab upper & lower Limit values.

Its populating correct value in output file when we download individually or with 500-600 MR Order.

 

The problem is occurring only when we download in mass like 150000 MR order together.

 

Help me here if anyone have encountered this issues earlier.

 

Thanks,

Chandra Shekhar

↧

EA04 - Posting Area R401

February 17, 2015, 12:23 pm
$
0
0

Here is the issue that I'm facing:

 

1.  first the invoicing job provided this error message:  in the invoicing document is:  Document splitting for comapny code xxxx is not active Message# FAGL_LEDGER_CUST081.

 

2.  I debugged because I found virtually no assistance on the error message.  We checked the maintenance of the new g/l and it is not marked for splitting for any of the ADID entries for the in production company codes nor the future company codes.  Through debugging found the following posting area stated that it was not maintained for the new company code.  Account determination not possible for key 1200, posting area Billing Default Values: Repayment Method (R401) through debugging. 

 

 

3.  I am unable to maintain posting area R401.  The values are as follows:
   CoCode                    Payment Method                 Form ID            PF DirDebP

0001                              *                                        *                         *

1000                              *                                        *                         *

3100                             *                                         *                         *

 

I would like to add the new company codes but get an error stating that the asterisk is not an acceptable character.

 

Have others incurred this issue?  If you have any advice - it will be much appreciated.

 

Thank You

↧
Search

Budget Billing Plan issue

February 16, 2015, 1:01 am
$
0
0

All,  There is a issue and I am looking for inputs to solve the same. Any pointers will be appreciated.

The problem is: We are having Budget billing Plan for Residential Customers in the Project. The cycle of billing is bi monthly so if the BBP is to be created for a year it should have 6 cycles. For some reason, when the last invoice has renewed the payment plan for next year, it has created only 5 plans instead of six. There has been no change to any configuration and no issue in invoicing. Please suggest anyone has information as how it can happen. Thanks !!

↧

Moving an installation from one premise to another

February 18, 2015, 11:44 am
$
0
0


We currently use a custom code to move utility installations from one premise to another.  I had heard that SAP was adding this to ES64 as an option in that transaction.  Is anyone familiar with whether or not it will be an option through ES64?

↧
↧

Biller Direct Notification types are not saved

February 18, 2015, 9:43 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

In Contract Account/Biller direct tab, when I select either SMS, Paper Bill or Email option and click on save ,message appears as no changes we made.

Do I need to update any configuration? I remember seeing those fields in FKKVKP table at different client.

 

Appreciate your help.

 

Thanks,

Arvind

↧

Electronic incoming bank transfer to FICA payment lot

January 8, 2015, 4:51 am
$
0
0

Hi export ,

 

Can anyone advise me how to handle the bank incoming file transfer to FICA payment lot?

 

I tried to ran T-code FPB7 but there is always show no data . does anyone figer out what kind of data should input for " ID"

 

↧

SAP Utilities ISU and CRM - Refresh of Non production systems from Production

February 18, 2015, 7:13 pm
$
0
0

Hello Friends,

 

I am working on the System refreshes approach and strategy for SAP Utilities ISU and CRM. Requirement is to Refresh Non production systems from Production database size being 1 TB.

 

I would like to have your inputs on the tools we have for Refresh. Specially for SAP Utilities industry.

 

TDMS 4.0 is definitely out there but would be great if you can share some success stories of it.

 

Gold Client - How is this tool with SAP Utilities ?

 

Any other tools ?

 

Thanks

 

Ravi

↧
Viewing all 2484 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>