Hi Experts ,
I have created one operand of QUANT type. I am changing the values on this Operand through my custom program.
I have a requirement to block the installation if any one tries to change this operand by transaction ES31 (change installation).
This operand should only be updated through my custom program.
No body can make the manual changes in this operand.
How this can be done?
Thanks and Regards,
Jasvinder Kumar
Hi,
Our company has a desire to use UCES. Please tell me which companies are already using UCES? Where you can see an example of the UCES?
Thanks in advance.
Andrew
Hello,
I have a requirement where a duplicate Relationship category should be created for a BP Contact (BP in Contact Person - BP Role). A BP Contact sometimes is assigned dual roles in the company for the same active period/time.
For Example: BP 1 (MKK Role): CompanyXYZ
BP 2 (Contact Person Role): PersonABC.
PersonABC is a Contact Person for CompanyXYZ. The relationship for this PersonABC is created by assigning the Relationship Category 'Is Contact Person For' from 01/01/2013 to 05/01/2013. This PersonABC will have a Relationship Type (for ex.) Production Manager.
I need to create one more Relationship Category 'Is Contact Person For' from 01/01/2013 to 05/01/2013 for the same BP CompanyXYZ but assign a different Relationship Type (for ex.) Funding Manager.
In short I need to duplicate a relationship category for a Contact Person who plays a dual role in a company.
I tried to do this but SAP stops me with an error "This Relationship already exists". Anyone knows of any event to modify this part? or has come across this problem and knows solution? Please advice.
Regards,
Praveen
Hi Experts ,
We are facing below error in EA27 -
Message no. >0104
The open items you wanted to select could not be selected because user Massaverwerk locked the following object:
Return to the items later on and try to select them then. If a lock is displayed due to a system error, notify your system administrator. In this case, the error is probably an RFC connection between the application server and the ENQUEUE server that is not working
Anyone has an idea about this error ?
is it related to some basis configuration ?
Regards,
Nachiket
Hi Experts,
I am very fresh in FICA and may be my questions are quite primitive:-)
I have a question regarding Payment Run. Whenever a payment run is made, the entries are stored in DPAYH table. There is a field GRPNO, which is filled automatically. I have found that if GRPNO > 100, It is normal payment group.
1 - exceptions, 2- zero balance, 3- internal clearing 4 -payment cards.
In my DPAYH-GRPNO, there are other values maintained like 102,103 and so on. Till now i am under impression that GRPNO 101 indicates Group of payment. What does these other groups means? When are these new groups came into existence?
In the value range table of DPAYH-GRPNO. 101 - 2177483647 indicates group of payments.
Where are these defined. These values started populating after installment went go-live.
Thanks in advance!
Lakshmi.
Hi,
We have EFT refund and cheque refund functionality in ISU system. Both of these FPY1 jobs run in production system.
Sometimes, credit items marked for EFT refund are picked up in the exception list for cheque refund FPY1 job. The rejection reason is given as 10 (Payment method in item should not be included for this run) in DPAYP-POKEN.
However the item is selected successfully in the next day's EFT refund job and refund document is posted.
Is there any note to rectify the issue?
Thanks
Bodhisattwa
Hi,
We want to implement ISU-EDM module for gas nomination, scheduling, allocation and gas loss for our company. Basicaly we are into CITY GAS Distribution. We have fully implemented ISU module in our company. For EDM module pls suggest the procedure though I have created the profile header for elementry quantity based profile but i am unable to insert daily ( Gas Nomination ) profile values.
Regards
Girish Bahuguna
hi dear gurus..
in my current Indian utility company wants to calculate service tax 12% on receiving down payments from cash desk 'FPCJ'. i tried with the following specification when amount is taken from customer as a advance through fpcj with a selection check box on account. when i am posting from fpcj system is not picking the tax amount it's only picking normal down payment with a combination os 0060 and 0010.
# i assigned tax codes at sub transaction level, i tested manually result working fine with 0060 and 0010
# is there any limitations for FPCJ to adding additional tax amounts ?
# can u give a exact functionality of a fpcj on this kind of process
thaks...
Ran
Message was edited by: William Eastman
Hello Experts,
I 've requirement to automatically perform reset clearing whenever invoicing reversal is done. Could you please tell me what config should be done for this? I tried to check "Invoicing Reversal" node under "Integration" in the "Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable" but somehow this config didn't work for me. May be I am missing dependent nodes. Can you please help. Let me know if there is any other way to do this automatic reset clearing. Thanks.
-
Kind Regards,
Nikhil J.
Hi All,
I am trying to reverse a document 1001637 in EA21 but getting the following error
''''
Document 1001637 cannot be reversed for adjustment due to document 1001636
Message no. AH758
Diagnosis
Document 1001637 is to undergo a special reversal. Document 1001637 already represents the new billing of document 1001636, which was reversed for adjustment. It is not possible to link adjustment reversals by means of a renewed adjustment reversal.
Procedure
A normal reversal must be executed for document 1001637 - that is, an invoicing and billing reversal. If this is no longer possible, you can create a manual credit memo or backbilling.
''''
In table ERCH the document 1001636 is being shown as reversed.
Can somebody explain me what this error message means?
Thank you.
Hi Experts,
Note : FM Derive has been done for Revenue GL and also based on Main & sub. Using trace we are able to see the FMAREA, Fund center and Fund. In scenario - Real posting, it is posted without error. Statistical posting is also posted with error.
Scenario: However during account maintenance (FP06) of statistical document with “payment on account” , the below error is coming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FM account assignment is missing from business partner line item
Message no. FKKFMCHK008
Diagnosis
You want to post a document that is recorded in Funds Management. To do this, you must assign an FM account assignment that contains at least the relevant company code (and therefore the corresponding FM Area in FM as well), a commitment item and a funds center.
In this document, the FM account assignment is incomplete.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
Complete the FM account assignment data and repeat the posting transaction.
please help
Regards
Hi,
I have the requirement to update Business Area when FPG1 transaction is run, using event 940.
But in this event, i did not found any such parameter to update it and export the same using 940 event.
Then i tried to find the implicit enhancement spots in the program RFKKGL00 which FPG1 refers, but i could not find anything useful.
Please help me in this regard, if you have came across the same.
Thanks & regards,
Ravi.
Hello, I have a problem executing the transaction FP40 Initial situation: 3.- The business partner BP1 has two contract accounts: CA10 and CA20 1.- The contract account CA10 belongs to company code TR10 (FKKVKP-OPBUK = TR10 and FKKVKP-STDBK = TR10) 2.- The contract account CA20 belongs to company code TR20 (FKKVKP-OPBUK = TR20 and FKKVKP-STDBK = TR20) 4.- I have a posting (P1) which contract account is CA10 and the company code of the posting (BUKRS) is TR10
If I try to transfer the posting P1 with FP40 to the contract CA20, then I get the message "Input values do not match or exist"
That is because the posting P1 has the BUKRS = TR10 and the target contract account (CA20) belongs to TR20.
Because TR20 <> TR10, then I get the error.
My question is, why does SAP deliver such message?
The new postings must have the contract account CA20 and BUKRS = TR10.
I already have postings in SAP where the contract account is CA20 and the BUKRS is TR10
What do I do wrong?
Cheer and thanks in advance
Mar
Hi All,
we have activated withholding tax on security deposit, the tax is getting calculated correctly both for the base document on which withholding tax is getting calculated is not getting updated completely.
In the document overview under tax section withholding tax base is updated properly with the tax rate but the withholding tax amount is showing as 0.00.
Please let me know if there is any note for this issue.
Regards,
Gaurav
Hi Exports,
Please guide, how to find the current ISU version in SAP?
Regards,
Sri...
Hello All,
While doing a moveout reversal, we are facing a dump error saying Transaction 0620 / 0020 not supported-Correct your entry. Whereas all the settings are maintained in the system.
Can anyone guide on this issue.
Regards
Charvi
Hi Gurus,
I am getting an message in the status bar stating "Allocation not poss.; Location of prof. vals of role and prof. different".
I have created a Profile in EEDM07 and now I am trying to assign an device and its register to the profile but I am getting this error.
Please help.
Regards,
Manoj
Hi All,
We are calculating withholding tax on the security deposit interest. During release of the security deposit we are calculation the interest and the withholding tax. The tax is getting calculated as expected. Just wanted to understand if its SAP standard:
1. The interest and withholding tax both are posted with same document number.
2. suppose interest amount is 12.50GBP and the rate of 20% the withholding tax amount is 2.5GBP.
3. On the account balance I could see two line items of same for the document; one with amount 12.50GBP and another with 2.5GBP.
4. As per our clearing rule the 12.50(interest amount) is getting used for clearing the debit items. The other part of withholding tax is lying as debit item due to which it is getting used for the dunning.
Query - The document created for interest and withholding tax same so the document should have just shown the net off amount? Please clarify?
Regards,
Gaurav
I am searching a BAPI function which can perform the function of EG70 (change rate data), ie, update the RateType and Fact Group is each register under an installation and device.
Can anybody helps? Thanks very much and point must be rewarded.
Hi Experts,
I am new to SAP - ISU
My requirement is to switch the Register Billed Meters to Interval Billed Meters.
I have a list of devices on which I have to perform this action.
Please let me know the complete flow of changing the Register Group to Rate Type and Fact Group.
Regards,
Manoj