Hi,
I am trying to process electronic bank statement in FICA using BAI format and post Payments Lot/Returns Lots. I see that in FICA, FPB17 transaction process only Multicash file format. Does anyone know on how to proceed using a BAI file in FICA? Do we need a conversion program to convert BAI to Multicash? Please advise. Any help/lead is greatly appreicated.
Regards,
Praveen
Hi
In SAP R/3 4.7 or earlier releases,Agent is not authorized to change the layout in EMMACLS Screen (which is secured).
But in SAP ECC,there is an option to change the layout by the Agent itself.In My scenario,i need to restict the agents not to move from one layout to other layouts because they are not intended to work on the clarification cases of different layout.Is there any way, we can achieve this functionality by removing the option of changing the layout to the agent?
I have checked in authorization Object B_EMMA_CAS .But actvt field is not providing this functionality.Please help on this?
Regards,
Surya
Hi ,
i have created a payment method D for direct debit and assign this to contract account now i am taking payment through FPY1 but item is not paid error is showing in application log ...... Is there any configuration is missing ? but same payment method when assigned at document level then no error comes,please find screen shot below.
Hi All,
I am facing a peculiar problem with BPEM Processor rule.
I have defined a processor rule with some responsibilities.When i am triggering the case category from the function module BAPI_EMMA_CASE_CREATE(i.e case creation type : Manual),the processor rule is getting triggered and the clarification case is getting assigned to the respective agents.
I have changed the case creation type to Automatic for the same case category,then i tried creating clarification cases throughthe tcode EMMA,Clarification case got created but the agent determination in not happening.
I am using same processor rule for both the scenarios.Its looks strange to me now.Can anyone suggest me if i am missing anything ?
A customer originally active was CC XXX and there is now a pending CC YYY enrollment. A TDSP charges idoc came in with start date lying before customer's enrollment with YYY and having end date after the enrollment so failed due to a time slice issue and the period overlaps 2 customers. The case gets created in EMMACL with CC YYY which should be XXX,
But my issue is EMMA Case is not getting created in my case.
We are running EA29 to generate RDI billing file. Now we have a requirement to skip certain customers. Is there a user exit that we can use for EA29 to filter contract accounts. Any ideas are welcome. Thanks
Hi,
I have the requirement where i have to create the contact records for the Business Partner whenever there is a call made to the customers, before specific processing starts. Its like the services we get from customer care in our day to day life by calls.
I am recieving the files which contains all the fields regarding to which contact records has to be updated.
In SAP system, i have to update fields like - Date , Time , Text field containing text 'Inbound/Outbound' based on Called Number , Another Text field containing text 'Callback attempts' based on no.of Callback attempts.
I already have contact action and contact class values provided to me.
These fields i have to update based on calls made and create contact records for the same in SAP.
I do have one BAPI - BAPI_BCONTACT_CREATEFROMDATA which has date and time fields. But i am not sure where to pass these two text fields.
Can anyone please help as its urgently required. I am new to FICA so dont know much about the same.
It will be really thankful if response comes for the same.
Regards,
Ravi.
One user by mistake set BP as person BP in plce of comercial BP. Over a period this BP has got transactinos. Please let me know if we have way to change BP type from person type to Org BP.
ECC6.0- Looking for a way to schedule background jobs, created independently to run depending on the other. Currently there are two t-codes executed at the close of business 5:30PM:
T-code FPVA runs the dunning proposal then t-code FPVB executes the dunning run at 9:00PM
T-code EA20 is executed to run billing at 12:05AM
Invoicing runs at 1:00AM
Printing runs at 2:00AM
Is there a way that these can be scheduled to run depending on the other, ? Currently we use SM36 to schedule background jobs and SM37 to extract the information, but I don't know if ECC6.0 has the capability for this job?
Thanks in advance
Valentina
Hi experts,
I would like to know from which structure field I can read the fica document number.
I want activate an exit in the DMEE structure to send the fica document number in the tag-<Unstructured>.
Thanks in advance.
Hello everyone,
I need to change the invoice recipient (contract account - business partner) during the invoice creation process.
So, I would like to ask you if there is any event/user exit that I can use in order to do that with the minimum effort.
The standard program involved is RFKKINV01.
NB: since the Billing process is triggered by Banking System (BS) (thanks to a specific integration with ECC - FI-CA), it is not possible to change details in billing document itself.
Thanks and regards.
Ermanno
Facing error while Using INST_MGMT in ECC 6 EHP 6 version. However the same is working fine with EHP 5 version.The error message says "Enter Rate type".We have rate type applicable only at Register level and the same is supplied in the input file.
With some suggested config change, the error message changes to "Not all meter reading results are entered"
Anybody came across sucha situation in EHP 6 version.Need urgent help.
Hi,
For Managing the responsible for the cash desk (add, change or interim manager) we use the transaction FQ_FPCJ_NC (Normal Clerk) in the development system to make the necessary changes and then transported into production system.
We need your help for a solution or suggestion to perform this task directly into production whithout need transport from development
Best Regards
Anybody knows any good document on how FI-CA is integrated with Vertex O Series as external tax systems? In our current systems, it is set up in FI-CA to update table TTXI and TTXY for tax updates for FI-CA, however, in FI-CO, the entries for tax updates are stored in ETXDCH and ETXDCI. Is this the standard SAP functionalities to update different tax tables in ECC?
We have seen some scenarios that the tax amount in billing document in CRM (which is configurated to use TTE) is different than the taxes posted to FI-CA document. Is there a tax calculation done in FI-CA when the document is passed from CRM to FI-CA?
Need some guidelines documentation on how FI-CA is integrated with external tax systems like Vertex.
Thanks,
Hello everybody,
I have the following problem.
I post the following items in SAP:
-100 USD to the business partner BP1 but alternative payee BP2
-300 USD to the business partner BP1 but alternative payee BP3
...
-100 USD to the business partner BP1 but alternative payee BP2
At the end of the month, how do I know how many USD I have paid to BP2? There is a report? I can't see the amounts for BP2 in the FPL9
Cheers and thanks in advance
Mar
Hello All ,
I am unable to do the full installation.
Getting an error ' MR result exist for time prior to installation'.
I followed the below steps -
1. Create a device .
2. Create Device Location .
3. Then create installation .
4. Then do Full Installation .
But i am not able to complete the 4th step.
Also when i check in EL37 , i am unable to delete the mr result because there
exist no mr result
Please help me in this problem.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rahul
Dear all, I have the folllowing requirement.
When running the automatic clearing, a clearing document should be created per invoice/ debit item. Currently what is happening is for a contract object, all invoices and open credits are set off in a single clearing document.
Current behaviour:
a) Account balance:
Invoice 1 : $100
Invoice 2: $300
Open credit: $1000
b) Run the automatic clearing
Clearing document 01 posted with 3 subitems
Subitem 1 : $100
Subitem 2: $300
Subitem 3: -$400
Open credit of $600 posted
Current requirement:
a) Account balance:
Invoice 1 : $100
Invoice 2: $300
Open credit: $1000
b) Run the automatic clearing
Clearing document 01 posted with 2 subitems
Subitem 1 : $100
Subitem 2: -$100
Clearing document 02 posted with 2 subitems
Subitem 1 : $300
Subitem 2: -$300
Open credit of $600 posted
Can anyone advise on how to achieve this(note that event 0591 cannot be used to achieve the above)?
Hi experts,
I want to automate our process for MRO creation or Schedule record creation.
this could be automated through recording.
Any other options are available?
And if it is there explain me in detail.
It will be great help for me. Thanks..
Regards,
Priya
I am aware that the relationship between connection object and premise is 'one to many'. However, I have come across in few utilities industries (predominantly in UK) that they are maintaining 'one to one' relationship. When enquired the reason given was (in addition to few other trivial reasons) to maintain proper relationship with Ordinance Survey data (Postal Address data) and ease in fetching premise address.
My concern is, in the process of maintaining 'one-to-one' relationship the premise object is made almost redundant. Other than few technical benefits I couldn't find any pressing business benefits that I could get to suggest a migration towards 'one-to-many'.
Even though SAP House suggests that the relationship should be 'one-to-many' the verbatim in the SAP help document is not explicit, in fact there is a bit of ambiguity. Reproducing the verbatim for easy reference; "A connection object is usually a building but can also be a piece of property or a facility, such as a fountain or construction site."
My question is what are the positives and negatives of maintaining 'one-to-one' relationship between connection object and premise?
Issue with WBS element:
While transporting the Reconciliation Key 130502-001 we are getting an error. Like
Message no. BP604: Item 005 WBS element O/5D12R00018-01 budget exceeded
Diagnosis
In document item 005 WBS element O/5D12R00018-01, budget for WBS element
O/5D12R00018 for fiscal year 2013 was exceeded by 84,981.00 INR.
Please find the screen short in attachment.
For this issue I have updated new WBS Element O/5D13R00018-01 for SPS business area, which is created for 2013 fiscal year by PS team.
So, I have updated the new WBS element in below Path
SPRO-Img-Financial Accounting New-Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable- Basic Functions- Postings and Documents- Document- Define Account Assignments for Automatic Postings- Define CO Account Assignment Keys
For SPS business area only.
And
SPRO-Img-Financial Accounting New-Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable- Basic Functions- Postings and Documents- Document- Define Account Assignments for Automatic Postings-Store CO Account Determination Key for IS-U Contracts
After making above changes I have saved it and transported to quality sever.
But after transporting to quality severs for Store CO Account Determination Key for IS-U Contracts the WBS Element is not updating properly it is updating some old WBS element instead of O/5D13R00018-01.
Note: And I checked that new WBS element is created and released in Quality Server
Please guide me how to overcome this issue ASAP.
Thanks in advance